4 Comments

Do you have a sense for how many loans are in each section? I would imagine that the negatively impacted areas align with the majority of loans today, while the positively impacted areas represent, no pun intended, the minority.

Also, the administration has been vocal about equity goals, so why not simply talk plainly about the motivation of redistributing from those who take on less risk to those who take on more?

Expand full comment

Sounds to me as though the new rules will lead us down the path to more defaults as people with better credit make bigger down payments and people with worse credit borrow more than they can afford. A different path back to 2008. Or am I reading this wrong?

Expand full comment