When Brett Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court, Akhil Reed Amar testified on his behalf, arguing that the candidate had “studied the Constitution with more care, consistency, range, scholarliness, and thoughtfulness than any other sitting Republican federal judge under age 60” and was “the best choice from the long list of 25 potential nominees publicly circulated by President Trump.” And when a draft of the Dobbs decision was leaked, Amar
Share this post
The Amar Brief
Share this post
When Brett Kavanaugh was nominated to the Supreme Court, Akhil Reed Amar testified on his behalf, arguing that the candidate had “studied the Constitution with more care, consistency, range, scholarliness, and thoughtfulness than any other sitting Republican federal judge under age 60” and was “the best choice from the long list of 25 potential nominees publicly circulated by President Trump.” And when a draft of the Dobbs decision was leaked, Amar